Medical
Malpractice ERCP Informed Consent Pancreatitis |
Carol
Forte recently obtained a $1.5 million jury verdict against a
gastroenterologist who performed a potentially dangerous procedure
known as an ERCP without fully informing the patient of all of
the risks of that procedure or alternatives to it. |
The
ERCP procedure involves passage of a scope through the esophagus
into the biliary system, in order to look for stones in the bile
ducts. After the ERCP, the patient developed severe pancreatitis,
was hospitalized for eight months and underwent five surgeries. The defense lawyers argued that the patient knew about the risks, and that
the procedure was performed according to medical standards, and
that the ERCP procedure was not the cause of the injuries suffered
by the patient. Carol argued that the patient would not have had this test had he known the
serious risks involved, and introduced evidence to show that the
patient's injuries were a direct result of the test. The verdict by the jury was in the plaintiff's favor, in the amount of $600,000. The defendant's motion for a new trial was denied by the court. |
Medical
Malpractice ERCP Informed Consent Pancreatitis |
